Learning Content
Module Overview
Building an accurate AI model in development is only half the battle. Deploying it to production—where it processes real data, integrates with business systems, and impacts actual users—introduces new challenges: scalability, reliability, security, and operability. Poor deployment decisions can turn a great model into an unusable system.
This module teaches deployment strategies tailored to Malta businesses, from batch processing to real-time APIs, cloud vs. on-premise decisions, and how to rollout AI systems safely without disrupting operations.
🔑 Key Concept: Deployment Patterns Matter as Much as Algorithms
A 90% accurate model deployed poorly (slow predictions, frequent downtime) delivers less value than an 85% accurate model deployed excellently (fast, reliable, well-integrated). Focus on production engineering, not just model tuning.
Deployment Architecture Patterns
Pattern 1: Batch Prediction
How It Works: Model runs on schedule (daily, hourly, weekly) to score large datasets. Predictions stored in database for business applications to consume.
Example Use Cases:
- iGaming Churn Prediction: Score all active players nightly for churn risk. CRM system shows risk scores next morning for retention team.
- Retail Demand Forecasting: Generate weekly sales forecasts for all products every Sunday night.
- Credit Risk Scoring: Score all loan applications daily in overnight batch process.
Advantages:
- Simple architecture—doesn't require real-time infrastructure
- Cost-effective—batch compute cheaper than always-on real-time APIs
- Easy to debug—can rerun batch if issues occur
- Handles large volumes efficiently
Limitations:
- Not real-time—predictions lag by hours/days
- Can't respond to immediate events (e.g., fraud detection during transaction)
- Wasted compute on users who don't need prediction
When to Use: When real-time predictions aren't needed, processing large volumes, or minimizing infrastructure costs
Pattern 2: Real-Time REST API
How It Works: Model hosted as always-on API endpoint. Business applications send requests, receive immediate predictions (milliseconds).
Example Use Cases:
- Fraud Detection: Each transaction sent to API during checkout, blocked if fraud risk high
- Product Recommendations: Website calls API when user loads page, displays personalized product suggestions
- Chatbot Responses: Natural language API processes user messages, returns intelligent responses
Advantages:
- Real-time responses—predictions made when needed
- Scalable—can handle variable traffic with auto-scaling
- Efficient—only predict for users/events requiring it
- Integrates easily with web/mobile applications
Limitations:
- Complex infrastructure—requires API hosting, load balancing, monitoring
- Higher costs—always-on servers vs. scheduled batch
- Latency critical—users won't wait seconds for predictions
- Requires robust error handling (what if API down?)
When to Use: When decisions must be made immediately, user-facing applications, or event-driven responses needed
Pattern 3: Streaming/Event-Driven
How It Works: Model listens to event stream (Kafka, AWS Kinesis), processes events in real-time, publishes predictions back to stream.
Example Use Cases:
- Real-Time Anomaly Detection: Monitor transaction stream, flag anomalies immediately
- Dynamic Pricing: Monitor demand signals, adjust prices in real-time
- IoT Predictive Maintenance: Sensor data streamed, predict equipment failures before they occur
When to Use: High-volume event processing, sub-second latency requirements, complex event processing pipelines
Pattern 4: Edge/Mobile Deployment
How It Works: Model runs directly on user's device (mobile app, browser, IoT device) rather than cloud server.
Example Use Cases:
- Mobile Game AI: Opponent AI runs on player's phone, no server needed
- Offline Recommendations: App provides recommendations even without internet connection
- Privacy-Preserving AI: Sensitive data never leaves device (e.g., health data analysis)
When to Use: Privacy requirements, offline functionality needed, or minimizing latency/bandwidth
Cloud vs. On-Premise Deployment
Cloud Deployment (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud)
Advantages:
- Elasticity: Auto-scale compute resources based on demand
- Managed Services: Cloud providers handle infrastructure, focus on models not servers
- Pay-as-You-Go: Only pay for what you use, no upfront hardware investment
- Geographic Distribution: Deploy globally close to users
Disadvantages:
- Cost Unpredictability: Bills can spike unexpectedly with high usage
- Vendor Lock-In: Tied to cloud provider's services and pricing
- Data Residency Concerns: For GDPR, may need EU-specific regions
Popular Malta Cloud Options:
- AWS (Amazon): Most comprehensive, complex. EU regions: Frankfurt, Ireland. Cost: €500-€10,000+/month depending on usage.
- Azure (Microsoft): Strong enterprise integration. EU regions: Netherlands, Ireland. Similar cost to AWS.
- Google Cloud: Strong ML tools (Vertex AI). EU regions: Belgium, Netherlands.
On-Premise Deployment (Your Own Servers)
Advantages:
- Full Control: Complete control over hardware, network, security
- Predictable Costs: Fixed hardware investment, no surprise bills
- Data Sovereignty: Data never leaves your infrastructure
Disadvantages:
- High Upfront Investment: €20K-€200K+ for capable server infrastructure
- Operational Overhead: Need IT team to maintain servers, updates, security
- No Elasticity: Can't scale dynamically; over-provision or risk capacity limits
When On-Premise Makes Sense: Highly sensitive data (financial, healthcare), regulatory constraints preventing cloud, or existing unused server capacity
Hybrid: Best of Both Worlds
Common Hybrid Approach:
- Store sensitive data on-premise (Malta servers)
- Process and train models in cloud (EU regions for GDPR compliance)
- Deploy predictions back on-premise or via private cloud connection
Deployment Rollout Strategy
Phase 1: Shadow Mode (2-4 Weeks)
- AI runs in production but predictions aren't acted upon
- Log predictions alongside actual outcomes for validation
- Verify accuracy matches test set performance
- Identify integration issues without user impact
Phase 2: Canary Deployment (1-2 Weeks)
- Route 5-10% of traffic to new AI system
- 90-95% still uses old system (or no AI)
- Monitor performance, errors, user feedback closely
- If issues detected, easy to stop and fix
Phase 3: Gradual Rollout (2-4 Weeks)
- Incrementally increase traffic: 10% → 25% → 50% → 100%
- Monitor continuously at each stage
- Pause or rollback if metrics degrade
Phase 4: Full Deployment + Monitoring
- 100% traffic on new AI system
- Continuous monitoring and optimization
- Periodic retraining (quarterly or when drift detected)
Malta Case Study: iGaming Recommendation Engine Deployment
Company: Malta iGaming operator, 1.8M players, deploying game recommendation AI
Requirements:
- Real-time recommendations (player loads website, sees personalized game suggestions within 200ms)
- Handle peak traffic: 15,000 concurrent users during major sports events
- GDPR-compliant (EU data residency)
- 99.5% uptime (downtime means lost revenue)
Deployment Architecture Decision:
- Pattern: Real-Time REST API (need immediate predictions)
- Infrastructure: AWS EU (Ireland) region for GDPR compliance
- API Framework: FastAPI (Python) in Docker containers
- Scaling: Auto-scaling (2-10 instances based on traffic)
- Load Balancing: AWS Application Load Balancer distributes traffic
- Database: Redis cache for fast lookups (player profiles, recent games)
- Monitoring: CloudWatch metrics + PagerDuty alerts
Cost Analysis:
- API hosting (AWS EC2): €800/month (avg 4 instances)
- Load balancer: €200/month
- Redis cache: €150/month
- Data transfer: €300/month
- Total: €1,450/month (~€17K/year)
Deployment Rollout (8 Weeks):
Week 1-2: Shadow Mode
- API live but not called by website
- Internal testing team triggered predictions
- Discovered API timeout issues under concurrent load
- Fixed: increased connection pool size, optimized database queries
Week 3-4: Canary (10% Traffic)
- 10% of players see AI recommendations, 90% see generic "popular games"
- Monitored: API latency (avg 145ms ✓), error rate (0.3% ✓), click-through rate
- Result: 28% increase in click-through rate for AI recommendations vs. generic
- User feedback positive, no complaints
Week 5-6: Gradual Rollout (25% → 50%)
- Incrementally increased traffic
- Week 5: Load spike during Champions League final (20K concurrent users)
- Auto-scaling triggered: scaled from 4 to 8 instances automatically
- Latency spiked to 320ms temporarily, then stabilized at 160ms
- System handled peak load successfully ✓
Week 7-8: Full Deployment (100%)
- All players see AI recommendations
- Average API latency: 152ms (within 200ms target ✓)
- Uptime: 99.7% (exceeded 99.5% SLA ✓)
- Business Impact: 32% increase in game engagement (players playing more games per session)
Ongoing Optimization (Months 3-6):
- Implemented Redis caching for frequent players—reduced API latency to 95ms
- Added A/B testing framework—continuously test recommendation algorithm variants
- Quarterly model retraining—maintain accuracy as player preferences evolve
Deployment Success Factors:
- Gradual rollout prevented "big bang" failure—issues caught in canary phase
- Auto-scaling handled unpredictable traffic spikes (major sports events)
- EU cloud region ensured GDPR compliance (critical for Malta gaming license)
- Monitoring infrastructure detected and alerted issues before users impacted
Deployment Checklist
Before deploying AI to production:
- ☐ Performance Requirements Defined: Latency targets, throughput capacity, uptime SLA
- ☐ Deployment Pattern Selected: Batch, real-time API, streaming, or edge
- ☐ Infrastructure Provisioned: Cloud/on-premise servers, load balancing, databases
- ☐ Security Configured: Authentication, encryption, access controls, GDPR compliance
- ☐ Monitoring & Alerts: Dashboards, alerts for errors/latency/accuracy degradation
- ☐ Rollback Plan: Documented and tested process to revert to previous version
- ☐ Shadow Mode Tested: Verified production accuracy matches test set
- ☐ Canary Deployment: Tested on 5-10% traffic without issues
- ☐ Load Testing: Verified system handles expected + 2x peak traffic
- ☐ Documentation: API docs, integration guides, troubleshooting runbooks
Key Takeaways
- Four deployment patterns: Batch (scheduled processing), Real-Time API (immediate predictions), Streaming (event-driven), Edge (on-device)
- Cloud deployment offers elasticity and managed services; on-premise offers control and predictable costs
- For Malta businesses: Use EU cloud regions (Ireland, Frankfurt, Netherlands) for GDPR compliance
- Gradual rollout de-risks deployment: shadow mode → canary (10%) → gradual (25%/50%) → full (100%)
- Auto-scaling critical for unpredictable traffic (e.g., iGaming during major sports events)
- Monitor continuously: latency, error rates, accuracy, uptime—detect issues before users complain
- Real-time APIs cost more but enable user-facing AI; batch is cheaper for backend analytics
- Always have rollback plan—ability to revert quickly is production safety net
- Typical cloud deployment costs for Malta SME: €1K-€5K/month depending on usage